Impact of antithrombotic therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome.

Objective: Antithrombotic therapy has the potential to interfere with false lumen thrombosis. In type B acute aortic syndrome, the degree of false lumen thrombosis affects clinical outcomes. We aimed to explore the association of antithrombotic therapy with the prognosis of patients with type B acute aortic syndrome. Methods: We reviewed 406 patients with type B acute aortic syndrome who were discharged alive with and without antithrombotic therapy. The primary outcome was aorta-related adverse events, defined as a composite of aorta-related death, aortic rupture, aortic repair, and progressive aortic dilation. Results: Of the 406 patients, 64 (16%) were discharged with antithrombotic therapy and 342 (84%) were discharged without antithrombotic therapy. A total of 249 patients (61%) presented with intramural hematoma with complete thrombosis of the false lumen, and 157 patients (39%) presented with aortic dissection. During a median follow-up of 4.6 years, 32 patients (50%) in the antithrombotic group and 93 patients (27%) in the nonantithrombotic group had a primary outcome event. Cumulative incidence of aorta-related events at 1 and 3 years with death as the competing risk was higher in the antithrombotic group than in the nonantithrombotic group (19% ± 5% vs 9% ± 2% at 1 year and 40% ± 7% vs 17% ± 2% at 3 years, P < .001). Conclusions: Antithrombotic therapy might be associated with an increased risk of aorta-related events in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome.

Aortic enlargement in two weeks is associated with subsequent aortic events in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether aortic enlargement in 2 weeks in patients with type B acute aortic syndrome is associated with aorta-related adverse events. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included 183 patients who were diagnosed with uncomplicated type B acute aortic syndrome (classic aortic dissection and intramural hematoma) between 2010 and 2019 and had follow-up computed tomography at second or third week. Aortic diameter was measured at admission and at predischarge follow-up. Aorta-related adverse events were defined by a composite of aortic rupture, surgical or endovascular aortic repair, redissection, severe intestinal malperfusion, and aortic enlargement. RESULTS: The patients whose aortic diameter enlarged ≥2 mm but <5 mm in 2 weeks were categorized as moderate aortic enlargement group. During follow-up, 51 patients (28%) had aorta-related adverse events and 36 patients (20%) had moderate aortic enlargement. Patients with moderate aortic enlargement showed lower aorta-related event-free survival rates than those without moderate enlargement (48 ± 9% vs 90 ± 3% at 1 year, P < .001). On multivariable analysis, moderate aortic enlargement (subhazard ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 2.08-6.35; P < .001) and aortic diameter ≥40 mm at admission (subhazard ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-5.48; P < .001) were associated with aorta-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Moderate aortic enlargement in 2 weeks is a significant risk factor of aorta-related adverse events in patients with uncomplicated type B acute aortic syndrome. Patients with moderate aortic enlargement should be followed up carefully and may be candidates for subsequent endovascular treatment.

Comparisons between biopsy-proven versus clinically diagnosed cardiac sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) without histological evidence remains controversial. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of histologically proven versus clinically diagnosed cases of CS, which were adjudicated using Heart Rhythm Society or Japanese Circulation Society criteria. METHODS: A total of 512 patients with CS (age: 62±11 years, female: 64.3%) enrolled in the multicentre registry were studied. Histologically confirmed patients were classified as 'biopsy-proven CS', while those with the presence of strongly suggestive clinical findings of CS without histological evidence were classified as 'clinical CS'. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, heart failure hospitalisation and ventricular arrhythmia event. RESULTS: In total, 314 patients (61.3%) were classified as biopsy-proven CS, while 198 (38.7%) were classified as clinical CS. Patients classified under clinical CS were associated with higher prevalence of left ventricular dysfunction, septal thinning, and positive findings in fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography or Gallium scintigraphy than those under biopsy-proven CS. During median follow-up of 43.7 (23.3-77.3) months, risk of primary outcome was comparable between the groups (adjusted HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.75, p=0.22). Similarly, the risks of primary outcome were comparable between patients with clinical isolated CS who did not have other organ/tissue involvement, and biopsy-proven isolated CS (adjusted HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 0.56 to 2.70, p=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients were diagnosed with clinical CS without confirmatory biopsy. Considering the worse clinical outcomes irrespective of the histological evidence, the diagnosis of clinical CS is justifiable if imaging findings suggestive of CS are observed.